PDA

View Full Version : Alamein


enigma
07-27-2006, 09:36 PM
Some, what i think at least, intresting facts ive recently picked up about the 2nd battle.

882 guns started the initial barrage, it states that they all didnt open up at the same time.
Each shell was caculated so that all 882 rounds landed on the axis positions .... at the same time! :eek:



If you have read anything about the build up to the battle you may know that the divisions where able to get some training in before the battle.
From the book am reading, source given later, it states that each division, down to the Brigades and the battalions where able to practice there entire assualt several times before the battle.
Thats 4 infantry divisions and several armoured divisions.
Not only that they also practiced there assualts together with the armour and held other training excersises to imprive tank-infantry cooperation.

The Sappers also took many excersies and by the time the battle begun they had delevoped and trained in a new mine lifting doctrine which was learnt from all the armies pervious experiances.
The end reuslt being that they were able in excerises to clear a 16foot gap in a 400 yard minefield within 2 hours.

The arty officers came up with a new firing system based on the work of an New Zealand officer and where able to bring there guns into actions much more quicker.
The doctrine enabled the 8th army to bring in the Medium guns into action quickly firing into a 1200x400 square box with deverstating effect.

In the rear, as in near Cario and elsewhere in Egypt and the middle east, factories had been built. Plans and construction it would seem started during the eary 40s but where available pior to the battle.
They produced items needed for the army from trucks to optics for the gun sights, as well as that it seems that there farms also set up to feed the army, thus millions of tons of cargo was not needed to set sail to Suez freeing up cargo ships to bring other equipement and troops.
These factories where constructing 180 vechiles a day!

Between July and the battle, the desert airforce was able to take photos of the entire German frontline and in deapth every 4 days, giving the 8th army a massive boost intel wise.
Thanks to these photos they where able to find and mark down all axis arty batteries and there alt positions.
Other systesm including guys sitting on towers errected behind the front lines and looking for the flashes of the axis guns during the evenings, as well as teams who where monitoring the sounds.
These 3 menthods ID'd every axis gun.
During 2 minute periods, every Axis troop of 4 guns was hit by 10 troops of guns, 100 4.5 or 5.5 shells landed on each position.
Axis guns within Range of the 25 pounders were hit with the same feriousity.
Some Axis batteries where hit with 20-1 concentrations and 1 batter was hit by 36-1 concentration which destroyed it. :eek:
The bombardment also did not alert the axis defence like the infantry commanders had worried, it shocked the entire line facing the the advancing troops into silence and distrupted the Commuications network as well ... just as the bombardment had been planned to do so.

The Desert airforce before the battle stood at a strength of 730 aircraft, out of the frontline strength of 420 fighters only 50 were spitfires and over half where hurricanes.
The Axis had in the theater around 770 aircraft but a much lower service ability rate.
Pior to the battle the Airforce launched a bombing campaign agaisnt ports and the forward landing fields. It has stated these were not that effective destroying planes but did reduce the Stuka avilability to 50% and that on several days no a single axis plane was in the air on some days, thus they were not getting enough aerial intel.

Attempts where made to fool the Axis as to where the blow would land, decpetive messures such as the 'building' of a water pipeline heading towards the south.
Armoured divisions moving into positions in the south, then leaving in the evening ... however they would leave behind trucks with rubber tanks placed over them so it would seem they never left.
When they moved north they were covered with 'suncreens' so they looked like trucks etc.
The same happened with the arty, the guns where also desguised, ammo was burried and palced in trenches which had been dug already or in some cases years before.
The result was the Axis believed that the 8th Army would attack either in the south ... or along the costal road ... they had identifed the area where the attack would come but ...
They belived that it would take several days for build up of guns and tanks to take place before such an attack would come ... they had no idea the build up had already taken place.

The Axis defences it seems in the north was setup like a chessboard, a thing outpost line, minefileds all around, then the MLR further back with a chessboard layed out minefield infront. The empty gaps led to tanks into the path of multiple guns with flanking shots.
In the south, the minefields where designed to funnel the attacking force into positions where the defending infantry would be able to decimate them.

Strength of the Opposing Armies as of 23rd October:

.............................8th Army .......... Panzerarmee Afrika
troops ....................220 476 ................ 108 000 (53 736 germans)
Servicable tanks........1029*....................548**
Arty .......................892 .......................552
AT guns ..................1451***................1063
Mines ......................0 .........................445 358
Servicable planes ......530 ......................350

It states that the bald stats dont reflect the true status, the advantage was never as big as it would seem. It does state that roughly the 8th Army pocessed a 2-1 advantage over the Axis.

* 170 Grants, 252 Shermans, 216 Crusader II (40mil gun) , 78 Crusader III (6 pounder, weak armour though) , 119 Honey's (37mil gun), 194 Valentines (40mil gun, some prehaps armed with the 6pounder)
(should note the Crusaders and many of the Valentines are obsolete compared to the MkIV Specials - the MKIV F2 ... the version with the upgunned 75mil, and well the other panzers. 2 pounders or 40mil guns where just not enough)

** 249 German tanks
31 MK II's
85 MK III's
88 MK III Specials (upgunned versions ... most likly the longer 50mil version ... possibly short75mil version)
8 MK IV's (short 75mil)
30 MK IV Specials (longer 75mil gun)

*** 554 2 pounders (20mil) obsolete, since the AT batteries had been outfitted with the 6 pounder, these where given to the infantry battalions to give them more AT protection.
849 6 pounders (57mil gun ... but much more effective then the american 57mil gun)


Finally, the 8th army had been able to overcome the huge loss of supplies at Gazala, the shortages during July and build up quite a stockpile, however they had them more spreadout unlike at Gazala so that if the unknow happened ... they would not all be captured.
7 days worth of suppllies for 10 Corp
5 days worth of supplies for 13 and 30 Corp (each)*

500 000 gallons of fuel for 10 Corp

Arty ammo: 268 000 rounds for the 25 pounders (88mil)
12 800 rounds for the 4.5 inch medium guns
6 400 rounds for the 5.5 inch medium guns.

*Will add an order of battle soon.

Anyhoo thought id share, feel free to add stuff :)


Edit: woops forgot to add:-
Source:
Pendulum of War: The three battles of El Alamein - Niall Barr



X Corp - 1st and 10th Armoured divisions, am pretty sure 2nd Newlander division was added to the Corp but does seem to be part of the assualting divisions of XXX Corp for Operation Lightfoot.
It would seem XXX Corp was made up of all 4 assualting divisions - 9th Austrialian, 51st Highlanders, 2nd New Zealand and 1st South African.
It would then seem that XIII Corp was made up of:44th and 50th divisions, as well as 7th Armour and prehaps 4th Indian.

Those are just assumptions made on a map am looking at, bu feel free to correct me :)
I know for deff that at the time the armoured divisions other the 7th where under X Corp.

sid
07-27-2006, 09:47 PM
Thanks, some nice info in there.

DarkCanuck
07-27-2006, 10:06 PM
thanks man. good info. not too knowledgable about that battle, or the theatre.

enigma
07-27-2006, 10:15 PM
just some pics to show what the tanks are, some of the photos are shots from Africa, others are elsewhere.

The M3 Grant:
link
(http://tanxheaven.com/ljs/m3grant/03-M3'Grant',Bovington.jpg)
link (http://tanxheaven.com/ljs/m3grant/05-M3'Grant',Brussel.JPG)
Modified M3 Lee, note the bigger, lower turret (houses a Radio), i believe that its more armoured as well, due to the move of the radio the tank required one less crew member then the Lee.

M3 Honey:
link (http://www.btinternet.com/~ian.a.paterson/Equipment/Armour/Stuart_Desert.jpg)

Crusader MK II:
link (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:IWM-E-17616-Crusader-19421002.jpg)

Crusader MK III:
link (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Crusader_tank_III.jpg)

Valentine MK III (40mil gun)
link (http://ipmslondon.tripod.com/imagelib/sitebuilder/misc/show_image.html?linkedwidth=actual&linkpath=http://ipmslondon.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/valentine1.jpg&target=tlx_new)

Valentine MK IX (6 pounder)
link (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a0/IWM-KID-893-Valentine.jpg)

Sherman II
model, but gives a fair idea (http://www.battlefront.co.nz/Images/british/BR119.jpg)


PzKpfw MK II:
link (http://www.achtungpanzer.com/images/pz2a123.jpg)

PzKpfw MK III:
link (http://www.achtungpanzer.com/images/pz3col.jpg)

Possibly the MK III Speical:
link (http://www.achtungpanzer.com/images/pz3_j.jpg)

PzKpfw MK IV:
link (http://www.achtungpanzer.com/images/hunpz4.jpg)

MK IV Special:
link (http://www.achtungpanzer.com/images/pz4af.jpg)



Edit: Thansk guys :)

sid
07-27-2006, 10:20 PM
Slightly on top topic at the Imperial War Museum they have Monty's M3 Grant which he used in Africa.

enigma
07-27-2006, 10:34 PM
Ive got a picture of that tank ... well part of it. In one of the books i own theres the pic of him, half way out the turret, binocs in hand. :)

stumbled upon this on the net:
http://www.tankshack.com/testing/xoops-2.0.9.2/html/uploads/photos/1795.jpg
Thats his one :p and the pic i was on about is on the plaqe!

[BEF]-R!G4M0RT!Z
07-28-2006, 12:03 PM
Oh my god!! I took a picture of that tank, and didn't realise that it was Monty's personal tank! I didn't bother to read the information :(
http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f148/rigamortiz/P1010001.jpg

sid
07-28-2006, 12:28 PM
I didn't have a camera with me when I went. They have some pretty cool stuff there.

enigma
07-28-2006, 01:05 PM
-R!G4M0RT!Z']Oh my god!! I took a picture of that tank, and didn't realise that it was Monty's personal tank! I didn't bother to read the information :(
http://i46.photobucket.com/albums/f148/rigamortiz/P1010001.jpg
bah, some people just cant take hints :p

Kaos
07-28-2006, 01:23 PM
Enigma mate, you are my hero. All your info... great stuff.

enigma
07-28-2006, 01:38 PM
Enigma mate, you are my hero. All your info... great stuff.
Thanks :D

75thDeadMan
07-28-2006, 03:57 PM
I read a very interesting book on El Al a year or two ago. If you want a ton of info about the battle, including leading up to it and its affect on the war, i suggest you check out this book.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0670030406/qid=1154098569/sr=2-3/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_3/102-4481875-4598540?v=glance&s=books

not the quickest read, but a good one at that.

Hamilkar
07-29-2006, 12:40 AM
British tactics is fantastic.

As you guys know the saying.....

To create the perfect army you need:

American equipment, British Tactics, German leadership and Canadian soldiers.

This statement was proven wrong in many different situations, but in GENERAL it is a very true statement, well in ww2 standards

Kaos
07-29-2006, 02:25 AM
British tactics is fantastic.

As you guys know the saying.....

To create the perfect army you need:

American equipment, British Tactics, German leadership and Canadian soldiers.

This statement was proven wrong in many different situations, but in GENERAL it is a very true statement, well in ww2 standards

But what about the ANZAC spirit?! Aussie soldiers pulled their worth in Alamein, give them some credit man! :p

BillSpargo
07-29-2006, 07:39 AM
But what about the ANZAC spirit?! Aussie soldiers pulled their worth in Alamein, give them some credit man! :p

Yeah! Those are fighting words. We're coming over to smash your face in.:mad::p

enigma
07-29-2006, 09:50 AM
British tactics is fantastic.

As you guys know the saying.....

To create the perfect army you need:

American equipment, British Tactics, German leadership and Canadian soldiers.

This statement was proven wrong in many different situations, but in GENERAL it is a very true statement, well in ww2 standards
lol,
just in case you where serious,

well we kicked the shit out of the italians with British equipement and the Germans on many occasions with british tanks (really the only americano stuff we used was tanks).
The British generals did great throughout the war but there was alot of bad luck, outnumbered or just outfought sometimes.
And there was no Canadians in Africa :p

But what about the ANZAC spirit?! Aussie soldiers pulled their worth in Alamein, give them some credit man!
they didnt just pull there worth .... they kicked major ass! :D

Shnur
07-29-2006, 03:49 PM
But what about the ANZAC spirit?! Aussie soldiers pulled their worth in Alamein, give them some credit man! :p

Hehe. Just like in Tobruk.

British Officer: Alright. You keep this town. No retreat. You won't have any supply routes, and for 8 months Rommel will be throwing everything he has at his disposal at you. You'll be horrifically outnumbered, have very little food and water and even less ammunition. Got that?

Australians: Yeah, we dig that shit. Bring it on.

Hamilkar
07-29-2006, 07:08 PM
You guys can't seem to read the last part of my post.....

enigma
07-29-2006, 08:31 PM
You guys can't seem to read the last part of my post.....
This statement was proven wrong in many different situations, but in GENERAL it is a very true statement, well in ww2 standards
In General ...

hence my post just in case you where serious :p

[BEF]-R!G4M0RT!Z
07-29-2006, 08:36 PM
Oh yes, Enigma, I forgot to thank you for the information, keep up the good historical posts! :)

enigma
07-29-2006, 08:38 PM
-R!G4M0RT!Z']Oh yes, Enigma, I forgot to thank you for the information, keep up the good historical posts! :)
:D thank you very much :)

[BEF]-R!G4M0RT!Z
07-29-2006, 08:57 PM
No problems, you always seem to astound me with your vast knowledge in the things you post on the forums :)

enigma
07-31-2006, 12:37 AM
Finally am carrying on reading this book,

It states even though all that arty landed on the Axis gun positions and quite allot of the guns were destroyed, few gunners were killed as most of the Germans and Italians were sitting in there slit trenches after another day of quietness on the front, thus they where able to bring quite a few of the guns back into action of the course of the fighting. :eek:

Also states after a 5 minute pause from the initial bombardment, to replot the guns, they started pounded Axis forward positions in co-op with the airforce.

This was done to cover the 8 brigades of infantry who made the assualt towards the Axis lines.
One of the Australians, who did not take part in the assault, instead made small diversionary raids northwards. As well as that a Boston bomber "accidentally" lit up part of the Aussie line just as a company stood up.
They had rigged 75 dummies to stand up via remote control for when the Boston flew over.
For the next 4 hours the Germans laid considerable fire into this area and when the small raiding parties came back with prisoners the Germans where convinced they had defeated part of the main attack! :D
Genius!

Operation Lightfoot, The Aussies, Kiwis, Highlanders and the South Africans who took part surprisingly - the majority of the assaulting troops managed to dig in on the final objective and the supporting arms brought up.
Some had made it there with no problems at all while others where blown apart in minefields and cut up via mg fire and mortars but still made it though.

They had to make something like a 5-6 mile advance (in the dark, through minefields (and clear gaps in them), through the enemy lines and clear enemy outposts they had missed) iirc ... something which had been considered impossible only a few months before hand, yet with the time to rest, train etc etc .... they pulled it off! :eek:

Again, surprisingly.... is that it seems that the sappers from 1st and 10th Armoured also pulled it off clearing gaps wide enough to get armour forward!


The New Zealanders had captured the Miteiriya ridge during there assault and had dug in with there supporting arms by day brake. 10th Armour who had gapped the minefields moved up and tried to exploit pass the ridge but several troops and squadrons where knocked out thus the Divisions CO ordered that all 3 armoured regiments take up hull down positions on the reverse side of the ridge with the New Zealanders.
Squadrons which had went forward where wiped out on mines and Axis AT guns.

The Axis formations had been ordered to thin out the frontlines and thus they had built a considerable in depth defence. Knowing there side of the ridge made great defensive ground they had dug in AT guns there.

Thus the tanks could not go forward, they could … they could probably head all the way through the Axis lines but would take murderous losses and there supply vehicles would never get through making such an assault useless.
So there they stayed it seems on the ridge with the infantry and came under axis shelling, although this was subdued via the 8th Army arty.

[BEF]-R!G4M0RT!Z
07-31-2006, 08:10 AM
Wow very interesting. I shall have to look into getting this book, or one by the same author, because he appears to know his stuff! :)

enigma
08-06-2006, 12:44 AM
I know understand why Infantry divisions, which may contain many thousands of men can have very few infantry.

The seven battalions of New Zealand Infantry averaged a strength of 27 officers and 470 other ranks,

FreyBurg the divisions commander comments:

....it must be realised that in each infantry battalion is an irreducible minimum of 16 officers and 328 Or's composed of men of Bn HQ and HQ Coys who cannot take part in the assault with the bayonet. They comprise the following:

Bn HQ - 4 Officers, 50 Other Ranks
HQ Coy - Coy HQ 2 officers, 12OR
1 Pl Sigs2 officers 35 OR
2 Pl AA 20 OR
3 Pl Mortars 1 officer 44 OR
5 Pl Carriers 2 officers 41 OR
4 Pl A Tk 3 officers 69 OR
6 Pl Admin 2 officers 57 Or

The author then states:

Whatever the offical strenght of an infantry battalio might be, the growth of the essential 'specialist' platoons often meant that there were very few infantry soldiers left to actually mount an attack.
The fighting state of the New Zealand infantry battaliosn meant that each battalion had roughly 200 men, in four companies of 50 men each, who could actually 'go forward with an attack as fighting men'.
This meant that there were only 1400 infantrymen left in the division whose total strength was 11,774 men.

As the other states
His figures give a rare glimpse into the dilemma of dwindling infantry manpower which every British infantry commander faced at El Alamein

:eek:




Edit: On the Night of the 31st October and the early morning of 1st November, the Austrialians where reorganising after several attacks and defesive actions over the course of the previous few days.
On of there rigades which was mauled moved into reserve while a fresh Aussie brigade took up its positions. For a few hours, somewhat ironically ... the one thing Rommel needed the most - an open road to Alexandria was there.
The Aussies during there daring mid battle reorganisation left the front door open so to speak.

However Rommel was unaware of this and if he was unable to do anything about it as his fuel situation became worse, and that night yet another tanker was sunk by Wellington Bombers.

enigma
08-06-2006, 05:13 PM
More arty nastiness

Operation Supercharge opened up with 360 guns firing, 8+ field regiments (25pounders) plus it would seem 2 medium regiments.

They fired 150 000 rounds in 4000 yard square in 4 and half hours ... to crush the Axis defense.

Sounds truly impressive and the observers back this up. Sort makes you wonder what the Russian barrages were like :eek:

The creeping barrage as the author states was not a thin line of shells but massive carpet of fire covering 100 yards every 2 n a half minutes.

More guns also pounded the flanks.

To add to that 184 tons of bombs was dropped by the airforce on the Axis commuications, essentially cutting the Axis HQ from the front line.

And as with Lightfoot, Bofors AA guns fired down the brigade boundies and also provided the infantry with an idea in which why they had to head as well as smoke shells being dropped on the initial objectives and final objectives!


Edit: lol as the infantry started off behind the barrage. The scots had there pipers playing and other units had hunting horns going .... jeez am not surprised if the Axis crapped themselves.